Title Tale: The Mortgage That Wouldn’t Stay Dead

Written by: Kevin Weaver, Unwriting Counsel

There are few things in life more comforting than the phrase “free and clear.” It sounds clean, final, almost spiritual. Like a monk ringing a bell in a mountain temple, or a pristine spring bubbling up in a virgin forest. Or perhaps more appropriately in the real estate world, like an escrow officer finally closing a file at 8:00 p.m. on a Friday.

So when ABC (Always Be Closing) Title Company issued a title commitment showing a property free and clear of mortgages, everyone involved breathed easier.. However, the lender for the new transaction, cautious as lenders tend to be when large sums of money and human optimism collide, questioned whether Lender X had an open mortgage that ABC Title Company had missed. Research was conducted. The public records reflected that a prior mortgage held by “Lender X” had been properly released months earlier, which explained why the mortgage was not reported on the commitment. The release not only appeared legitimate, it was legitimate. The records were clean. The loan closed.

Case closed.

Except, of course, it wasn’t.

Months later, ABC Title Company learned that Lender X had begun foreclosure proceedings on the very mortgage it had supposedly released. Like a villain returning in the third act after dramatically falling off a cliff, the mortgage had somehow survived its own demise.

Further investigation revealed the twist: after the closing, Lender X recorded a notice stating that its prior release had been filed “in error,” and that the mortgage remained outstanding.
One imagines a collective groan from every person involved in the transaction.

Borrower, understandably alarmed, was advised to retain legal counsel. ABC Title Company, meanwhile, found itself in the awkward position of being both likely correct and potentially very busy. Under longstanding principles of recording law, the new lender and Title Company relied upon a duly recorded release appearing in the public records at the time of closing. That reliance matters. It’s called constructive notice. Public records exist so parties can trust them without needing a séance or a forensic accounting team.

Likely, the new lender’s insured mortgage should retain first lien priority. Courts are generally reluctant to punish innocent parties who reasonably relied upon recorded instruments that appeared valid on their face. Otherwise, the entire recording system would collapse into chaos, and every closing would require bloodhound investigations into whether someone at a bank accidentally clicked the wrong button six months earlier.

Still, being right and proving you are right are two very different things.

Even if ABC Title Company ultimately prevails, defense costs will follow. Lawyers, unlike recorded releases, rarely disappear by mistake. Litigation consumes time, money, and patience. Borrowers lose sleep. Lenders grow irritated. Title examiners develop tics and new stress-related facial expressions.

So, is there a lesson here?

Several, actually.

First, public records are indispensable, but they are not divine scripture. Errors happen. Releases are mistakenly filed. Institutions occasionally discover their “clerical error” only after another transaction has already closed and funded.

Second, title insurance exists precisely for these moments — when certainty suddenly becomes less certain. Most people view title insurance the way they view umbrellas: mildly annoying until the storm arrives.

And finally, there is a broader lesson about modern commerce itself. Entire industries depend upon trust in systems that are ultimately operated by imperfect human beings. Recording statutes, title examinations, mortgage servicing platforms — all are designed to create order from potential confusion. Most days, they succeed quietly and invisibly. But every so often, one resurrected mortgage reminds everyone that behind every neat stack of closing documents lurks the ever present possibility of human error.
In real estate, as in horror films, sometimes the thing everyone believed was buried comes clawing its way out of the grave.

Here We Grow AGAIN!

May Webinars

StewartNow Property Profiles/How to Customize Data Lists with TitlePro 247

Wednesday, May 13, 2026

10:00 am PST

Click here to register.

 

Online Fee Calculator & Order Source Portal

Wednesday, May 20, 2026

10:00 am PST

Click here to register.

May Calculator Updates

We are constantly updating to reflect any increases or decreases in state fees or underwriter changes to ensure you are pulling accurate quotes each time. Our calculator has been updated to reflect fee changes in the following state(s):

 

-Alabama

 

Conveniently get a quote any time, day or night, by simply and accurately inputting the required information and let our interactive fee calculator do the rest. Please call 844-808-8299 or email [email protected] for further details or for a quote.

Title Tale: Deadlock in Title, The Missing Death Certificate Problem

Written by: Mylene Marcelo, Title Manager/Title Officer

One of the most common issues we continue to encounter in title and curative is the missing death certificate. While it may seem like a routine document request, the death certificate often becomes critical to establishing clear and insurable title especially in files involving survivorship rights, deceased borrowers, trusts, inherited property, and probate-related matters.

The challenge is that recording requirements vary significantly by state and sometimes even by county.

For example, in Butler County, Alabama, death certificates are generally not recorded as standalone instruments, and an Affidavit of Death may be recorded together with a redacted certified copy of the death certificate. In Chippewa County, Michigan, an affidavit together with a copy of the death certificate may be acceptable but other counties will require certified or original copy. In Jackson County, Missouri, an original death certificate is required for recording and in Franklin County, Ohio, the county auditor will require the original death certificate as part of the process.

It is important to know that County recording requirements may also change over time depending on how instruments are indexed, recorded, or reviewed within the local recording system. Some counties may update their recording standard requirements based on grantor/grantee indexing practices, legal description requirements, assessor integration, fraud prevention measures, or recording system updates. Because of this, title and our recording teams are continually reviewing and updating requirements as counties revise their recording practices and acceptance standards to avoid recording delays and rejections.

A recent Florida transaction highlighted how important this issue can become. In that file, property was held by joint tenants with survivorship rights. After one owner passed away, the county would not accept the Affidavit of Deceased Joint Tenant for recording without the original death certificate or a certified copy. The issue arose when the borrower refused to provide the death certificate. Without the death certificate, the affidavit could not be recorded, the deceased owner’s interest remained outstanding in the public records, and title could not fully reflect vesting into the surviving joint tenant. As a result, the interest remained unresolved from an insurability standpoint.

This is important because recording the survivorship affidavit together with the death certificate helps transfer the deceased owner’s interest into the surviving joint tenant and updates the public chain of title accordingly, including assessor records. Although files may contain obituaries, family affidavits, or online notices, these documents generally do not replace the legal reliability of a certified death certificate for recording and underwriting purposes. In Attorney state that requires an opinion letter, it is always a requirement. While it may appear to be “just another condition,” the death certificate often becomes one of the most important documents needed to properly clear title and avoid future ownership or underwriting concerns.

If you have any questions or doubts regarding recording requirements involving death certificates, survivorship affidavits, or related estate documentation, we encourage you to reach out to your favorite escrow team for guidance.

April Calculator Updates

We are constantly updating to reflect any increases or decreases in state fees or underwriter changes to ensure you are pulling accurate quotes each time. Our calculator has been updated to reflect fee changes in the following state(s):

 

-Kentucky

-Texas

-West Virginia

 

Conveniently get a quote any time, day or night, by simply and accurately inputting the required information and let our interactive fee calculator do the rest. Please call 844-808-8299 or email [email protected] for further details or for a quote.

April Webinars

Fraud Prevention

CRMP Certified – Advanced

Thursday, April 9, 2026

10:00 am PST

Click here to register.

 

Manufactured Homes

Wednesday, April 15, 2026

10:00 am PST

Click here to register.

 

StewartNow Property Profiles/How to Customize Data Lists with TitlePro 247

Wednesday, April 22, 2026

10:00 am PST

Click here to register.

Escrow Corner: ARS Borrower’s Authorization Form

Most lenders and banks require our company specific borrower’s authorization form. Click here to download the ARS Borrower’s Authorization form. A copy of this form is also included in our order confirmation email and available for request on our website. Click here to review and request documents, flyers, and forms.

 

We recommend having this form completed for every open order if there are any liens. Without it we cannot request a payoff. It is important to note that e-signatures are not always accepted and a copy with a wet signature may be required.

Stewart Title Named as a Forbes Best Large Employer

 

Stewart was included in Forbes America’s Best Large Employers 2026 List. About the award, Fred said, “The best companies are vision-driven and our vision is clear – to be the most respected title company in the industry. Recognition like this reflects the strength of our people and our culture. A culture committed to being a destination for top talent where our employees can build long-term careers, do meaningful work, and make a real impact. We continue to invest in our people and our infrastructure because long-term success requires a strong foundation to seize the opportunities ahead of us.”

 

Last year Stewart Title was named to two other Forbes lists: America’s Best Employers for Company Culture 2025 and America’s Best Employers for Women 2025.

Title Tale: The Final Check That Protects Your Loan

Written by: Mylene Marcelo, Title Manager/Title Officer

 

Most files look clean—right up until the moment they’re ready to fund. Everything is moving along, conditions are cleared… and then something new shows up.

 

It could be a lien or judgment recorded overnight, a bankruptcy filing that wasn’t there earlier, or even an unannounced deed that changes vesting at the last minute.

 

We also see situations where the legal description doesn’t fully line up with the appraisal report—especially when the appraisal hasn’t been shared with us. In some cases, this comes down to simple but impactful issues like clerical errors in the legal description or an incorrect parcel identification number, which can affect what is actually being insured and may require clarification before funding.

 

In Florida, timing can be especially tricky. A Notice of Commencement filed by the borrower can surface during the final title update, creating potential lien exposure that needs to be addressed before closing. In certain attorney states—such as North Carolina, South Carolina, Massachusetts, and Georgia—additional complexities can arise. Outstanding interests may be addressed through an attorney opinion letter, and in Georgia, even a recorded deed can present issues if attestation requirements are not properly met. These scenarios often require coordination and legal review before a file can move forward.

 

You might wonder why these items aren’t identified earlier in the process. The reality is, many of these matters are recorded at the last minute—or the discrepancies only become clear upon final review—and simply do not appear in earlier searches. The final title update—the “date down”—is designed to catch exactly these types of changes in real time, just before funding.

 

Throughout the process—and especially leading up to funding—our team is continuously reviewing the entire file. From title to vesting to property details, we are taking that final, comprehensive look to help ensure everything is accurate, aligned, and positioned to close without issues.

 

From our side, we’re actively reviewing for: New recordings that affect title or priority,

 

Changes in vesting or ownership, Legal description errors, or County/APN discrepancies, and State-specific risks, including construction filings and attorney-driven requirements.

 

Most of the time, everything is still clear. But when it’s not, catching it at this stage helps avoid delays, surprises, and risk after closing. Because a file that starts clean isn’t what matters most—what matters is that it stays clean through funding.